MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091367272 · doi:10.1109/tr.2013.2240876

A Meta-Analysis of Multisample Type-II Censored Data With Parametric and Nonparametric Results

2013· article· en· W2091367272 on OpenAlexaff
N. Balakrishnan, William Volterman, Li Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Reliability · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiducial inferenceInferenceParametric statisticsNonparametric statisticsNotationType inferenceType (biology)Parametric modelMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsStatistical inferenceAlgorithmFrequentist inferenceApplied mathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss meta-analysis of multiple$s$-independent Type-II right censored data. In particular, we consider parametric inference using Best Linear Unbiased Estimation, as well as non-parametric inference. We provide pertinent numerical results and two examples to illustrate all the methods of inference developed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.078
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.226
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0780.226
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.022
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ReliabilitySame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207