Microprojectile-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of Chinese elm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A protocol for the genetic transformation and regeneration of Chinese elm ( Ulmus parvifolia Ja cq.) is reported. Cell suspension cultures were initiated from hypocotyls and were maintained on Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal semi-solid medium supplemented with varying concentrations of thiadiazuron (TDZ) and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). Two week- old cell suspension cultures were bombarded with gold particles coated with plasmid harboring the Basta®resistance and â -glucuronidase genes. Elm cultures produced green calli within a month on selection media containing 20 mg L-1phosphinothrycin. These c alli were transferred to the same medium without the herbicide and were regenerated into shoots within 2 mo. The expression of uidA reporter gene in transformed elms was detected by histochemical analysis for â-glucuronidase activity. The presence of the Basta®resistance insert was demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Key words:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".