MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2091372035 · doi:10.4141/p02-142

Microprojectile-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of Chinese elm

2003· article· en· W2091372035 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. N. Aziz, Rémy Sauvé, Shu‐Feng Zhou, Xianghe Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsHypocotylTransformation (genetics)BiologyBotanySuspension cultureGUS reporter systemMurashige and Skoog mediumPlasmidBeta-glucuronidaseReporter geneGeneHorticultureCell cultureAgrobacteriumTissue cultureMolecular biologyGene expressionIn vitroBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A protocol for the genetic transformation and regeneration of Chinese elm ( Ulmus parvifolia Ja cq.) is reported. Cell suspension cultures were initiated from hypocotyls and were maintained on Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal semi-solid medium supplemented with varying concentrations of thiadiazuron (TDZ) and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). Two week- old cell suspension cultures were bombarded with gold particles coated with plasmid harboring the Basta®resistance and â -glucuronidase genes. Elm cultures produced green calli within a month on selection media containing 20 mg L-1phosphinothrycin. These c alli were transferred to the same medium without the herbicide and were regenerated into shoots within 2 mo. The expression of uidA reporter gene in transformed elms was detected by histochemical analysis for â-glucuronidase activity. The presence of the Basta®resistance insert was demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Key words:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicPlant tissue culture and regeneration→French-language works237,207→