MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091399029 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m505714200

Localization of a Disease-associated Mutation Site in the Three-dimensional Structure of the Cardiac Muscle Ryanodine Receptor

2005· article· en· W2091399029 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Liu, Ruiwu Wang, Jing Zhang, S. R. Wayne Chen, Terence Wagenknecht

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
KeywordsRyanodine receptor 2Ryanodine receptorBiologyRYR1MutationMissense mutationCardiac muscleGeneticsReceptorEndocrinologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cardiac muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR2) functions as a calcium release channel in the heart. Up to 40 mutations in RyR2 have been linked to genetic forms of sudden cardiac death. These mutations are largely clustered in three regions of the sequence of the polypeptide: one near the N terminus, one in the central region, and the third in the C-terminal region. The central region includes 11 mutations, and an isoleucine-proline motif (positions 2427 and 2428) in the same region is predicted to contribute to the binding of FKBP12.6 protein. We have mapped the central mutation site in the three-dimensional structure of RyR2 by green fluorescent protein insertion, cryoelectron microscopy, and single-particle image processing. The central mutation site was mapped to a "bridge" of density that connects cytoplasmic domains 5 and 6, which have been suggested to undergo conformational changes during channel gating. Moreover, the location of this central mutation site is not close to that of the FKBP12.6-binding site mapped previously by cryoelectron microscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207