MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W20914122

Dynamique du mercure dans les neiges de hautes et moyennes latitudes : études in situ et en conditions simulées des mécanismes de réactivité chimique et d'échanges

2003· preprint· en· W20914122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aurélien Dommergue

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2003
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesForestryArtGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mercury (Hg) is a globally dispersed compound. In the atmosphere, it can be deposited onto snowpacks, which constitute a temporary reservoir of this toxic compound. We do not know what is the role of these reservoirs in the global cycle of Hg. We thus developed a new tool dedicated to the measurements of Hg° concentrations in the air of snowpacks. We investigated Hg° reactivity at the polar sunrise, during springtime and during the snowmelt in Greenland and in Canada. We then discriminated the main factors governing Hg reactivity in the snow. Here we show that snowpacks are both a sink and a source of atmospheric Hg°. Hg° can be oxidised by radicals and be accumulated in the snow during low irradiation periods. During springtime, Hg° can be produced by photochemical reactions. During the snowmelt, more than 85% of Hg present in the snow is discharged into snowmelt waters leading to a potential contamination of the surrounding ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicMercury impact and mitigation studies→French-language works237,207→