Chemical Constituents from Centella erecta (L.f.) Fern.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Centella or Indian Pennywort, Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. belongs to the family Apiaceae. It has been widely cultivated in China, Southeast Asia, India, Sri Lanka and Africa as green vegetable and medicinal herb. It is valued in Indian system of medicine for improving memory and for the treatment of nerve disorders and skin diseases. The plant and its extract were incorporated into the Indian Pharmacopeia for the treatment of inflammation and epidermal wound healing. C. asiatica is becoming a popular ingredient in various herbal products. However, Centella erecta (L.f.) Fern. is very closely related species to C. asiatica that is commonly found in the southern US and is easily confused with each other. Although C. asiatica has been thoroughly investigated, no compressive chemical studies were done on C. erecta [1,2]. A new triterpene (2α,3β, 4α)-23-(sulphonyl)-2,3-dihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl ester (1) together with eleven known compounds including asiatic acid (2), madecassic acid (3), asiaticoside (4), mdecassoside (5), (2α,3β, 6β)-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl ester (6), Betulabuside A (7), 3-oxo-α-ionyl-9-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (8), vomifoliol-9-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (roseoside) (9), 1,8-heptadecadiene-4,6-diyne-3,10-diol (10), (2S)-1-O-stearoyl-2-O-stearoyl-3-O-[α-D-galacto-pyranosyl-(1″6ʹ)-β-D-galactopyranosyl] glycerol (11),(2S)-1-O-linolenyl-2-O-linolenyl-3-O-[α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1″6ʹ)-β-D-galacto pyranosyl]glycerol (12) (Fig. 1) were isolated from the whole plant of Centella erecta and their structures were elucidated using 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, HSQC, HMBC, COSY and HRMS as well as comparison with reported data. Acknowledgements: This research is funded in part by The United States Department of Agriculture Specific Cooperative Research Agreement Number 58-6408-6-067 and the FDA/CFSAN grant entitled Science Based Authentication of Dietary Supplements Number 2 U01 FD 002071-07. The Authors would like to thank Dr. Vaishali Joshi for authenticating the plant material. References: [1] Mabberley DJ, (1997), The Plant Book: A portable dictionary of the higher plants. Cambridge University Press. [2] Shakir JS, et al. Nat. Prod. Radiance 6(2): p.158–170, (2007).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".