Bending Properties of Co–Ni–Cr–Mo Alloy Wire for Orthodontic Application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to evaluate the clinical performance of the Co–Ni–Cr–Mo alloy wire in orthodontic application, bending properties of Co–Ni–Cr–Mo alloy wire was investigated in comparison with the conventional stainless steel wire and Co–Cr alloy wire. Three-point bending test was carried out for the wires with varied drawing rate up to 3.0 mm in deflection and then unloaded with 0.2 mm/s of loading/unloading speed. Bending yield load of the Co–Ni–Cr–Mo alloy wire increased and the residual deflection decreased with increasing wiredrawing rate. The best processing condition was decided as the wiredrawing rate of 78% with the age-hardening treatment. The bending elastic modulus of the Co–Ni–Cr–Mo alloy wire was higher than those of stainless steel wire and Co–Cr alloy wire. The bending strength of the Co–Ni–Cr–Mo alloy wire was lower than that of stainless steel wire and was comparable to that of Co–Cr alloy wire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".