MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091482787 · doi:10.1002/cnm.611

Analysis of a projection/characteristic scheme for incompressible flow

2003· article· en· W2091482787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsProjection methodAdvectionCompressibilityMathematicsConvergence (economics)Scheme (mathematics)Vector fieldProjection (relational algebra)Applied mathematicsDivergence (linguistics)Incompressible flowInversion (geology)Rate of convergenceGridNumerical analysisMathematical analysisFlow (mathematics)GeometryMathematical optimizationComputer scienceAlgorithmMechanicsPhysicsDykstra's projection algorithmGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper presents the convergence analysis of a characteristic/projection scheme for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. This scheme is a modification of the scheme analysed in Achdou and Guermond ( SIAM J. Numer. Anal . 2000; 37 (3):799) which does not eliminate the projected velocity field from the system but rather uses it as the advecting field in the explicit characteristic advection. This field has a zero (generalized) divergence and is therefore more suitable for this purpose. It appears that this scheme has the same convergence rate as the one in Achdou and Guermond ( SIAM J. Numer. Anal . 2000; 37 (3):799) but on a given grid seems to produce more accurate results. The computational cost is not significantly higher since it requires only one extra inversion of the mass matrix which can be done relatively efficiently. We present numerical results which illustrate the properties of the scheme. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it