MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091504910 · doi:10.1115/gt2007-28062

Direct Numerical Simulation of Pulsating Jet Mixing

2007· article· en· W2091504910 on OpenAlexaff
Sean Yun, Joan Boulanger, Lei‐Yong Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsMixing (physics)Jet (fluid)AmplitudeCombustionOscillation (cell signaling)Flow (mathematics)InstabilityComputer simulationMaterials sciencePhysicsOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In lean premixed combustors, the fuel/air ratio oscillation can cause a serious problem since it can produce pressure and heat release fluctuations, and further, combustion instability if it is well phased with them. In order to design a system where such air/fuel ratio fluctuation is well suppressed, it is important to understand the mixing process and its interaction with the flow structures inside a premixer. In this study, the flow-field of a pulsating jet and the mixing of the jet with the co-flow are examined using direct numerical simulation. The effects of the frequency and amplitude of the imposed pulsation on the flow structures and mixing process are investigated in detail. It is found that the modulation amplitude has a favorable effect on mixing, but the dependency on frequency is more complicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207