Simultaneous determination of beta‐blocking agents and diuretics in doping analysis by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with scan‐to‐scan polarity switching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A previously described method for the screening of 18 diuretics and probenecid was substantially extended with 21 beta-blockers and 8 other diuretics allowing simultaneous determination of diuretics and beta-adrenergic blocking agents in human urine. Analysis was performed using an ion trap instrument with an electrospray ionisation (ESI) interface after liquid/liquid extraction with ethyl acetate. Full-scan MS and full-scan MS2 were applied in combination with scan-to-scan polarity switching. All compounds were separated in less than 22 min. The detection limits for the diuretics were between 5 and 100 ng/mL and for the beta-adrenergic blocking agents were between 5 and 500 ng/mL. The excretion of carvedilol was followed after intake of one tablet of Dimitone. Other doping agents including strychnine, norbuprenorphine and mesocarb hydroxysulfate could also be detected with this method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".