Simultaneous determination of beta‐blocking agents and diuretics in doping analysis by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with scan‐to‐scan polarity switching
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A previously described method for the screening of 18 diuretics and probenecid was substantially extended with 21 beta-blockers and 8 other diuretics allowing simultaneous determination of diuretics and beta-adrenergic blocking agents in human urine. Analysis was performed using an ion trap instrument with an electrospray ionisation (ESI) interface after liquid/liquid extraction with ethyl acetate. Full-scan MS and full-scan MS2 were applied in combination with scan-to-scan polarity switching. All compounds were separated in less than 22 min. The detection limits for the diuretics were between 5 and 100 ng/mL and for the beta-adrenergic blocking agents were between 5 and 500 ng/mL. The excretion of carvedilol was followed after intake of one tablet of Dimitone. Other doping agents including strychnine, norbuprenorphine and mesocarb hydroxysulfate could also be detected with this method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it