MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091522639 · doi:10.1109/iccspa.2013.6487242

An online approach for learning non-Gaussian mixture models with localized feature selection

2013· article· en· W2091522639 on OpenAlexafffund
Wentao Fan, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOverfittingComputer scienceMixture modelArtificial intelligenceFeature selectionCluster analysisInferenceOnline modelMachine learningBayesian inferencePattern recognition (psychology)Model selectionUnsupervised learningFeature (linguistics)Bayesian probabilityMathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an online algorithm for mixture model-based clustering. Online algorithms allow data points to be processed sequentially, which is critical for real-time and large-scale applications. The proposed online algorithm is based on finite generalized Dirichlet (GD) mixtures together with a unsupervised localized feature selection scheme. By learning the proposed model in an online manner through a variational inference framework, all the involved model parameters, number of components and features weights are estimated simultaneously in closed forms. Additionally, the problem of overfitting is avoided due to the nature of Bayesian learning. The proposed method is validated by both synthetic data and an application concerning the online automatic image annotation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207