MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2091525084 · doi:10.1039/b704600f

Infrared spectroscopy of acetic acid and formic acid aerosols: pure and compound acid/ice particles

2007· article· en· W2091525084 on OpenAlexafffund
Moritz Gadermann, Daniel Vollmar, Ruth Signorell

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsFormic acidAcetic acidInfrared spectroscopyFourier transform infrared spectroscopyInfraredParticle (ecology)ChemistryCrystallizationSpectroscopyAerosolAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Particle sizeMaterials scienceChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acetic acid aerosol particles, formic acid aerosol particles and mixed acid/ice particles were generated in a collisional cooling cell at a temperature of 78 K and investigated using in situ rapid scan Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The infrared spectra reveal that the internal structure of the particles critically depends on the particle formation conditions and, especially for the mixed particles, on the composition. The acetic acid particles are likely to have only a partially crystalline structure whereas the formic acid particles are likely to have an overall crystalline structure. The existence of acid in the mixed acid/ice particles prevents the ice from crystallization even at low acid concentrations (less than 10%). Mid-infrared refractive index data were derived from the different particle spectra, which can be helpful for remote sensing of such systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→