MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091526095 · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31822f67f6

Effective Masking Levels for Bone Conduction Auditory Steady State Responses in Infants and Adults Run down Normal Hearing

2011· article· en· W2091526095 on OpenAlexafffund
Erin E. Hansen, Susan A. Small

Bibliographic record

VenueEar and Hearing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Academy of Audiology
KeywordsBone conductionAudiologyAudiometerMedicineBinaural recordingMasking (illustration)Hearing lossAudiometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To obtain ear-specific bone conduction thresholds, masking of the nontest ear is often required. Bone conduction masking has not been formally investigated for infants assessed physiologically. The objective of this study was to determine effective masking levels (EMLs) for auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) elicited by bone-conducted stimuli in a group of normal-hearing infants and adults. DESIGN: Participants were 15 infants younger than 6 mo and 15 adults, all with normal hearing. EML was defined as the lowest level of a binaural air-conducted masker that resulted in absent bone conduction ASSRs. Stimuli were single bone-conducted tones that were 100% amplitude modulated and 25% frequency modulated at 85 and 101 for 1000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. The stimuli were calibrated in dB HL (ANSI S3.6-1996) and expressed in dB HL or dB SL (dB relative to mean bone conduction ASSR thresholds reported in a previous study). The maskers were 1 and 4 kHz narrowband noise generated by a clinical audiometer. Unmasked and masked ASSRs were obtained for each participant. Real ear-to-coupler differences (RECDs) were also obtained for each participant and were used to convert masker dB SPL measured in the coupler to dB SPL in the individual ear canal. RESULTS: Infant EMLs for ASSRs elicited to bone-conducted stimuli in dB HL were 6 to 7 dB higher and 8 to 10 dB lower for 1000 and 4000 Hz, respectively, compared with adults. When masker was adjusted for RECDs, infant EMLs were 12 dB higher at 1000 Hz and similar at 4000 Hz compared with adults. When the stimulus levels were corrected for the mean differences in ASSR bone conduction thresholds between infants and adults and the masker levels adjusted for RECDs, infants had lower EMLs at 1000 Hz and equal EMLs at 4000 Hz, in comparison to adults. Frequency- and level-dependent effects on ASSR amplitude due to masking were found and differed between infants and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that there are frequency- and level-dependent infant-adult differences in EMLs for bone conduction ASSRs and confirm that a 1000 Hz stimulus is 12 dB more effective for infants compared with adults. The following infant preliminary masking levels for bone conduction stimuli are recommended: (i) 1000 Hz: 48 and 58 dB SPL at 15 and 25 dB HL, respectively, and (ii) 4000 Hz: 40 and 45 dB SPL at 25 and 35 dB HL, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEar and HearingSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207