MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091535056 · doi:10.1159/000133375

Molecular characterization of a mouse Y chromosomal repetitive sequence that detects transcripts in the testis

2008· article· en· W2091535056 on OpenAlexaff
Vânia F. Prado, C.-H. Lee, L. Zahed, Michel Vekemans, Yasuhiko Nishioka

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetics and Cell Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyComplementary DNAMolecular biologyclone (Java method)GeneticsSouthern blotY chromosomeChromosomeNucleic acid sequenceInbred strainSequence analysisIn situ hybridizationGeneMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

145SC5 is a Y chromosomal repetitive sequence isolated from a BALB/c mouse and is unique in that it detects poly(A)-containing transcripts in the testis. We determined nucleotide sequences of 145SC5 and a related cDNA clone designated PC11 and compared their sequences to that of pYMT2/B, another related cDNA clone. 145SC5 and PC11 are almost identical (97%), while PC11 and pYMT2/B share 84% identity. In situ hybridization and Southern blot analysis with XXSxr male mice demonstrated that 145SC5-related sequences were distributed over the entire length of the Y chromosome including the short arm. Two types of Y chromosome are present in inbred mouse strains: the Mus musculus musculus type and M.m. domesticus type. Among 26 inbred strains surveyed, 145SC5 detected polymorphims only in the M.m. domesticus Y chromosome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetics and Cell GeneticsSame topicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207