MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091545275 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2010.5493866

Nomadic Relay-Directed Joint Power and Subchannel Allocation in OFDMA-Based Cellular Fixed Relay Networks

2010· article· en· W2091545275 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Salem, Abdulkareem Adinoyi, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu, Young-Doo Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer networkComputer scienceThroughputChannel allocation schemesWireless networkPower controlWirelessCellular networkPower (physics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various standardization activities leading to 4G and beyond networks have considered the synergy of OFDMA and multihop relaying thus giving way for the fixed relay station (FRS)-based radio access network. As such, the next-generation networks will comprise a plethora of performance enhancing devices among which is the plug-and-play nomadic relay station (NRS). It is essential for such dense and inevitably frequency reuse-aggressive networks to employ efficient mechanisms to mitigate the co-channel interference and to provide prudent energy utilization; this brings about the timely environmental concerns and the so-called green wireless initiative in designing future wireless networks. We present a novel joint power and subchannel allocation algorithm for the emerging OFDMA-based nomadic-augmented fixed relay networks. This NRS-directed algorithm performs adaptive power control (APC) within the autonomous opportunistic NRS medium access and channel reuse, using two different approaches. The APC mechanism is realized in an open-loop manner requiring no feedback from the WT. We demonstrate the power savings and user throughput improvement obtained through the joint scheme. We also identify a throughput-power saving trade-off in terms of the number of deployed FRSs. Through this work, the authors further establish their pioneering techniques for realizing the concept of NRS-augmented networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207