MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091577693 · doi:10.1002/mrm.20848

Interactive continuously moving table (iCMT) large field‐of‐view real‐time MRI

2006· article· en· W2091577693 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Sabati, M. Louis Lauzon, Houman Mahallati, Richard Frayne

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionTable (database)Real-time MRIArtificial intelligenceImaging phantomScannerArtifact (error)Encoding (memory)Computer graphics (images)Nuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuously moving table (CMT) MRI is a new method that is capable of generating 3D, seamless, large field-of-view (FOV) images by acquiring readouts along the patient superior-inferior axis as the subject is translated through the scanner. For applications that require artifact-free images, such as arterial-phase contrast-enhanced (CE) angiography of the legs, a major challenge is to match the MR data acquisition and patient table motion with the dynamics of blood flow in the region of interest (ROI). Instead of restricting the CMT to predetermined constant table speeds, we adopted a more general approach in which the table motion is decoupled from the phase-encoding order. In our approach the table moves adaptively and in response to operator-provided feedback obtained from viewing real-time preview (or fluoroscopic) images. This interactivity is accomplished by integrating high temporal-spatial resolution encoding of the table position with real-time hybrid-space filling and image reconstruction. Experimental results obtained using our prototype interactive CMT (iCMT) system on a peripheral vascular phantom and five healthy volunteers demonstrate the feasibility of this robust and rapid imaging method for acquiring 3D large-FOV continuous images with patient-specific adaptive table motion profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207