MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091594313 · doi:10.1139/l03-091

Flexural behaviour of concrete beams strengthened with prestressed carbon fibre reinforced polymer sheets subjected to sustained loading and low temperature

2004· article· en· W2091594313 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Raafat El‐Hacha, Mark F. Green, R. Gordon Wight

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFlexural strengthDeflection (physics)Composite materialUltimate tensile strengthCarbon fiber reinforced polymerStiffnessPrestressed concreteStructural engineeringBeam (structure)Fibre-reinforced plasticReinforced concreteUltimate loadGirderFinite element methodEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents results of an experimental investigation that examined concrete beams post-tensioned with bonded carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets and then exposed to either room (+22 °C) or low (-28 °C) temperatures. The primary objective of this investigation was to assess the flexural behaviour of the strengthened beams after sustained loadings at both room and low temperatures. The strengthened beams showed significant increases in flexural stiffness and ultimate capacity as compared with the control-unstrengthened beams. Failure of the strengthened beams was by tensile rupture of the prestressed CFRP sheets. Test results showed that the long-term and low temperature effects did not adversely affect the strength of the beams. Long-term loading and low temperature exposure caused prestress losses in the CFRP sheets. The load–deflection behaviour of the long-term beams was predicted accurately by an analytical model. These results suggest that bonded prestressed CFRP sheets could be used to increase the strength of damaged prestressed concrete girders under extreme environmental conditions.Key words: strengthening, anchorage, low temperature, long-term, prestress losses, sustained load, carbon fibre reinforced polymer sheet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207