MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091599987 · doi:10.3917/gmcc.256.0107

La Brigade canadienne de Sibérie (Vladivostok et Omsk), octobre 1918 - juin 1919

2014· article· fr· W2091599987 on OpenAlex
Yves Tremblay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGuerres mondiales et conflits contemporains · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1918-1919 le Canada fournit trois contingents pour aider les forces anti-bolchéviques, dont l’un doit opérer à partir de Vladivostok. Mais ce contingent arrive tard et ne participe pas aux opérations. Deux raisons l’expliquent : d’une part, l’hostilité du cabinet à une décision prise par le Premier ministre Borden (qui était à Londres) sans consultation suffisante ; d’autre part, pendant la préparation et le transport du contingent, l’Armistice survient, ce qui rend difficilement justifiable le maintien sous les drapeaux de soldats pour une opération lointaine qui n’est pas populaire. La mission est un échec. Curieusement, le processus politique au plus haut niveau et les règles d’engagement restrictives imposées aux chefs sur place ressemblent aux conditions qui rendront difficiles les missions de paix auxquelles le Canada s’associera à partir de la fin des années 1950.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it