MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091608289 · doi:10.1300/j301v04n02_04

Evaluation of the Drip Loss of 30 Cultivars and 9 Advanced Selections from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada National Strawberry Breeding Program

2005· article· en· W2091608289 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall Fruits Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarAgricultureFood processingHorticultureBiologyFood scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fruits of thirty-nine strawberry genotypes were evaluated for their freezing performance based on their drip loss percentage. The amount juice lost was evaluated for each genotype after four months of storage (at — 20°C) upon thawing at 20°C for 20 hr. A preliminary selection based on the drip loss method or exudation enabled us to eliminate genotypes that are the least interesting from a freezing standpoint and to focus our efforts on those with a high processing potential. ‘NY1529’, ‘Scott’, ‘Arking’, ‘SJ8317-5’ and ‘SJ83145-1’ with less than 30% juice loss seems suitable for jam, yogurt and frozen food production. On the other hand, with more than 60% juice loss, ‘Tenira’, ‘Primela’ and ‘Splendida’ seem less desirable for processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it