MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091670203 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x05023773

HEAVY ANTIQUARK PENTAQUARKS IN THE CM AND GB MODELS

2005· article· en· W2091670203 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Maltman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPentaquarkPhysicsParticle physicsQuarkParity (physics)Goldstone bosonSpin (aerodynamics)BosonGoldstoneQuark modelNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The splittings between positive parity pentaquarks containing a single heavy (c, b) antiquark and four light (u, d) quarks are investigated in models having spin-dependent interactions generated by either effective Goldstone boson exchange or effective color magnetic exchange. Model-independent features of these splittings are emphasized. Overlaps to the "fall-apart" decay configurations ND, ND* or NB, NB*, relevant to decay couplings for the various 2-body pentaquark decays, are also computed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207