Determining Lung Water Volume in Stable Hemodialysis Patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lung water (LW) reflects the water content of the lung interstitium. Because hemodialysis patients have expanded total body water (TBW) they may also have increased LW. Hypertonic saline promotes a flux of water from lung to blood, which is measured by ultrasound flow probes on hemodialysis tubing. The volume of flux is an indirect measure of LW. Our purpose was to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of LW derived with ultrasound velocity dilution, to determine the effect of ultrafiltration on LW in stable hemodialysis patients, and to compare changes in LW with fluid compartment shifts using bioimpedance. Lung water, cardiac output, total body water, and extracellular and intracellular fluid volumes were measured in 24 stable hemodialysis patients at the beginning of hemodialysis and after ultrafiltration. The LW values at the beginning of hemodialysis (298.8 +/- 90.2 ml or 3.67 +/- 1.47 ml/kg) fell during hemodialysis (250.8 +/- 55.8 ml or 3.12 +/- 0.96 ml/kg; p < 0.05), as did TBW and extracellular fluid volumes (p < 0.001). Cardiac output, cardiac index, and central blood volume also decreased significantly with ultrafiltration (p < 0.005, p < 0.005, and p < 0.01, respectively). Results showed that stable hemodialysis patients have higher specific LW values (3.67 ml/kg) than the normal population (2 ml/kg) and ultrafiltration produces a significant decline in LW values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it