MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091692635 · doi:10.1080/00207231003668813

Ground source heat pump systems: current status

2010· article· en· W2091692635 on OpenAlex
Marwa S. Younis, Tirupati Bolisetti, David S.‐K. Ting

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat pumpGeothermal energyGeothermal gradientEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse gasEnvironmentally friendlyCurrent (fluid)Geothermal heatingEnvironmental engineeringRenewable heatGlobal-warming potentialWaste managementEngineeringHybrid heatHeat exchangerMechanical engineeringGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geothermal energy is critical to achieving more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy usage. Geothermal energy and the availability of the technology, Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) systems are becoming increasingly popular for heating and cooling of buildings. GSHP installations in different countries are increasing at a rate greater than 25–60%. The GSHPs produce near zero emissions rates of greenhouse gases (GHGs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it