Origins of Helix−Coil Switching in a Light-Sensitive Peptide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intramolecular cross-linking of peptides by the light-sensitive compound diiodoacetamideazobenzene has been shown to permit reversible photocontrol of the helix-coil transition. Cross-linking between Cys residues spaced at i and i + 7 positions with the trans form of the linker was found to produce a decreased helix content compared to that of the non-cross-linked peptide. Photoisomerization to the cis form of the linker led to substantially higher helix content than in the non-cross-linked peptide. Detailed conformational analysis of the system leads to the conclusion that photocontrol of helix content does not involve specific interactions between the linker and the peptide. Instead, the change in peptide helix content caused by photoisomerization can be predicted by comparing the length ranges of the cis and trans forms of the linker with the expected distance distribution of the Cys attachment points in the intrinsic conformational ensemble of the peptide. The analysis presented here should help to guide the use of these and related linkers for the conformational control of a variety of peptide and protein systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".