MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091700829 · doi:10.1139/v02-013

A theoretical study of the mechanism of 1,2-migrations in methoxysiloxycarbene

2002· article· en· W2091700829 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul G. Loncke, Timothy A. Gadosy, Gilles H. Peslherbe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNatural bond orbitalCarbeneIntramolecular forceLone pairDensity functional theoryComputational chemistryNon-bonding orbitalMolecular orbitalNucleophileSilylationMoleculeAb initioStereochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intramolecular rearrangements of methoxysiloxycarbene (CH3OCOSiH3) have been investigated by means of ab initio molecular orbital theory and hybrid density functional theory calculations. Particular attention was paid to 1,2-silyl migration from oxygen to the carbene carbon, and to the analogous 1,2-methyl migration for comparison. A combination of frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory, natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis, and the theory of atoms in molecules (AIM) were used to shed light on the mechanistic details of these rearrangements. The present analyses clearly indicate that 1,2-silyl migration involves nucleophilic attack by the carbene lone pair at silicon, whereas 1,2-methyl migration seems to involve an anion-like shift of the methyl group from oxygen to the "vacant" carbene p-orbital. Finally, based on the computed relative Gibbs free energy barriers, it is apparent that 1,2-silyl migration is much more favorable than 1,2-methyl migration, in keeping with experimental observations.Key words: carbenes, oxycarbenes, intramolecular rearrangements, 1,2-migrations, quantum chemistry, theory of atoms in molecules, natural bond orbital analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207