Dynamics and vibrations of structures with bonded piezoelectric strips subjected to mechanical and unsteady aerodynamic loads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an analysis of the dynamics of damaged structures with bonded piezoelectric strips executing flexural oscillations generated by mechanical loads, piezoelectric actuators or unsteady aerodynamic loads. These oscillations can be used to detect the presence of cracks for structural health monitoring. The proposed method of crack detection uses pairs of piezoelectric strip sensors bonded on the opposite sides of the structure and is based on the fact that the presence of a crack causes a difference between the strains measured by the two sensors of a pair. The structural analysis presented in this article uses a non-linear model for the cracks and a finite-element formulation for the piezoelectric strips coupled with the structure. A panel method is used to determine the unsteady aerodynamic loads acting on the oscillating wing structure. This study includes the dynamic analysis in the frequency domain of a cracked plate undergoing forced flexural vibrations in a range of frequencies generated by a pair of piezoelectric actuators. The dynamic analysis in the time domain is also performed for the oscillating structures with piezoelectric strips subjected to mechanical or unsteady aerodynamic loads. It was found that this method is quite effective in detecting cracks in the wing structures subjected to oscillatory aerodynamic loads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".