MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091719910 · doi:10.1021/ja010532v

Location of the Fluoride Ion in Tetrapropylammonium Fluoride Silicalite-1 Determined by <sup>1</sup>H/<sup>19</sup>F/<sup>29</sup>Si Triple Resonance CP, REDOR, and TEDOR NMR Experiments

2001· article· en· W2091719910 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorideChemistryZeoliteIonResonance (particle physics)Fluorine-19 NMRNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyPhysical chemistryInorganic chemistryStereochemistryAtomic physicsOrganic chemistryPhysicsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The location of the fluoride ion in tetrapropylammonium fluoride silicalite-1 ([TPA]-F-[Si-MFI]), an as-synthesized siliceous zeolite with the MFI topology, has been unambiguously determined using solid-state NMR experiments alone. With the 1 H→ 29 Si CP-INADEQUATE experiment, the 12 peaks in the highly resolved 29 Si MAS NMR spectrum of [TPA]-F-[Si-MFI] were assigned. Using these peak assignments it was possible to perform 1 H/ 19 F/ 29 Si triple resonance CP, REDOR, and TEDOR experiments to measure F−Si distances and thus locate the fluoride ion. It is covalently bonded to Si-9 in the [4 1 5 2 6 2 ] cage of the zeolite framework and exchanges between two “mirror-related” Si-9 sites, making them equivalent on the NMR time scale. The importance of this result and the general applicability of the approach are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it