MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Permanent Pacing from a Left Ventricular Vein in a Patient with Persistent Left and Absent Right Superior Vena Cava

2000· article· en· W2091732313 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular anomalies and interventions
Canadian institutionsOttawa Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePersistent left superior vena cavaCoronary sinusCardiologyImplantInternal medicinePermanent pacemakerVentricular pacingSurgeryHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistent left superior vena cava with coexisting absent right superior vena cava is rare with less than 150 cases in the literature. Various techniques for pacemaker implantation have been described in this situation. We report a 40-year-old man with sinus and atrioventricular nodal dysfunction who underwent dual chamber pacemaker implantation. We elected to implant the ventricular electrode down a left ventricular branch of the coronary sinus and the lead is stable at 4-month follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it