MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091738548 · doi:10.1080/01431160701294653

Estimating afternoon MODIS land surface temperatures (LST) based on morning MODIS overpass, location and elevation information

2007· article· en· W2091738548 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nicholas C. Coops, Dennis C. Duro, Michael A. Wulder, Tao Han

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerMorningElevation (ballistics)Land coverClimatologyMeteorologyDaytimeAtmospheric sciencesInsolationSatelliteRemote sensingGeographyLand useGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument on‐board the Terra and Aqua satellites is a critical tool for providing daily estimates of land surface temperature (LST). Terra launched in late 1999 has a morning (AM) overpass, whereas Aqua launched in early 2002 has an afternoon (PM) overpass. Generally, LST is expected, under cloudless conditions, to be warmer in the early afternoon than the morning due to the link between maximum skin temperature and solar insolation peak time, therefore the Aqua PM LST is likely to be closer to the maximum daily LST than that acquired from Terra. This letter investigated differences between the Aqua MODIS PM and Terra MODIS AM LST estimates over a range of land cover classes, locations, and dates, across Canada. The aim was to develop a simple adjustment which can be applied to Terra AM LST estimates to approximate a “synthetic” Aqua PM LST product from 2000 to mid‐2002, thereby providing a seamless afternoon MODIS LST product from 2000 to 2006. Results indicate that there are statistically significant differences between the AM and PM LST ranging from 0.3°C to 3.2°C depending on cover type, and between 1.2° and 5.0° depending on time of year. On average, over 90% of the variation observed in the PM record can be explained by the AM LST, land cover types and location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Remote SensingSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207