MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091741867 · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/n01

Preservation of diffusion tensor properties during spatial normalization by use of tensor imaging and fibre tracking on a normal brain database

2007· article· en· W2091741867 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H-P Müller, Alexander Unrath, Albert C. Ludolph, Jan Kassubek

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffusion MRISpatial normalizationWhite matterNormalization (sociology)TractographyScannerComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFractional anisotropyPattern recognition (psychology)Magnetic resonance imagingVoxelNuclear magnetic resonanceComputer visionPhysicsMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

White matter connectivity in the human brain can be mapped by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI). After reconstruction, the diffusion tensors, the diffusion amplitude and the diffusion direction can be displayed on a morphological background. Consequently, diffusion tensor fibre tracking can be applied as a non-invasive in vivo technique for the delineation and quantification of specific white matter pathways. The aim of this study was to show that normalization to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) stereotaxic standard space preserves specific diffusion features. Therefore, techniques for tensor imaging and fibre tracking were applied to the normalized brains as well as to the group averaged brain data. A normalization step of individual data was included by registration to a scanner- and sequence-specific DTI template data set which was created from a normal database transformed to MNI space. The algorithms were tested and validated for a group of 13 healthy controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207