MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091747142 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.43.4.1193

CALCULATED ACID BASE BALANCE FOR H2O2 OXIDATION OF CARBONATE-POOR PYRITIC MINE-ROCK

2005· article· en· W2091747142 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Weber, Joan E. Thomas, William Skinner, Roger St. C. Smart

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCarbonateBalance (ability)Base (topology)Carbonate rockAcid–base homeostasisGeochemistryMining engineeringMetallurgyChemistryMaterials scienceSedimentary rockMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An assessment of the net acid–base account following H2O2 oxidation of mine rock was established by chemical calculations based on the molar quantity of neutralizing cations (Na, K, Mg, Ca) and acid-generating S released during the Net Acid Generation (NAG) test. These neutralizing cations are derived from both silicates and carbonates; in carbonate-poor samples (ANCcarb < 5 kg H2SO4/t), however, the acid-neutralization capacity of silicate may be more important in neutralizing acidity than carbonate ANC. Testing is not recommended for samples that have signifi cant concentrations of non-acid-forming S, nonneutralizing cations or non-acid-forming sulfi de minerals, such as galena.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207