MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091756386 · doi:10.1021/jf000358e

Immunochemical and Structural Analysis of Pepsin-Digested Egg White Ovomucoid

2000· article· en· W2091756386 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Kovacs-Nolan, Jie Wei Zhang, Shigeru Hayakawa, Yoshinori Mine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPepsinEgg whiteTrypsinChemistryChymotrypsinDigestion (alchemy)BiochemistryChromatographyProteaseEnzymePeptide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ovomucoid, an egg protein comprising approximately 10% egg white, was digested using the enzyme pepsin, and fragments were isolated by anion-exchange and reverse phase HPLC. Four distinct fragments were identified by analysis with SDS-PAGE, including three large fragments with molecular weights of around 24, 18, and 14 kDa. N- and C-terminal and amino acid sequencing analyses identified the fragments as V134-C186 (domain 3), V21-A133, and A1-A133 (domain 1+2). Further separation and sequencing of the fraction composed of small peptides, to determine their exact makeup and location in the protein, remained to be carried out and identified a peptide G51-Y73. All four fragments showed IgE-binding activity, as measured by ELISA, using human sera from egg-allergic individuals. Little change in the digestibility of ovomucoid by trypsin and chymotrypsin was observed following digestion with pepsin, indicating that pepsin-digested ovomucoid retains its trypsin (protease) inhibitor activities. Reduced carboxymethylated ovomucoid was prepared, and digestion with pepsin produced significantly more peptides than did the digestion of the native ovomucoid, indicating that the disulfide bonds play a significant role in the digestive resistance of ovomucoid. The reduction of ovomucoid enhanced its digestibility and lower allergenicity of the protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207