MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091764316 · doi:10.1121/1.3384499

An eardrum impedance simulator for use with physical replicas of the human ear canal.

2010· article· en· W2091764316 on OpenAlexaff
Michael R. Stinson, Gilles A. Daigle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVoice and Speech Disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEardrumAcousticsEar canalSound pressureTest fixtureSimulationElectrical impedanceComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An eardrum impedance simulator has been incorporated into life-size replicas of the human ear canal. The simulator branches off from the ear canal at the center of the nominal eardrum position. It has been designed so that sound pressure distributions in an ear canal will have the same standing wave ratios as those measured previously in human subjects over the 4–10-kHz range. The key component of the eardrum simulator is a micro-perforated plate, whose holes provide damping through viscous and thermal boundary layer losses. The optimum design specifies 109 holes of 0.06 mm diameter in 0.003-in. shim stock. Measurements of sound pressure distribution in replica ear canals are underway to evaluate the acoustical performance of the eardrum simulator. The sound field is generated by an occluding hearing aid test fixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicVoice and Speech DisordersFrench-language works237,207