MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091788240 · doi:10.1080/00405000701830631

Geometry of plain weave fabric under shear deformation. Part II: 3D model of plain weave fabric before deformation

2008· article· en· W2091788240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Textile Institute · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsPlain weaveDeformation (meteorology)Woven fabricShear (geology)Composite materialMaterials scienceFabric structureTextileGeometryYarnStructural engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main attempt of this investigation is to establish a model for evaluating internal geometry of woven fabric. A new concept about packing density of yarns inside of fabric is putted in forward and then internal geometry of fabric before deformation is predicted by common data of a fabric. A numerical analysis has been performed for two kinds of actual plain weave fabric on the basis of proposed model. The geometrical specifications of these fabrics are successfully evaluated. This model is to be expanded for predicting shear deformation of fabric in subsequent Part III (Kamali Dolatabadi & Kovař, 2009b Kamali Dolatabadi, M. and Kovař, R. 2009b. Geometry of plain weave fabric under shear deformation. Part III: 3D model of plain weave fabric under shear deformation. Journal of Textile Institute, 100: 387–399. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it