Métaphores et modèles en géographie urbaine : le continuum de l'école de Chicago à celle de Los Angeles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose de revoir les apports de l’écologie urbaine de Park et Burgess à la lumière de la critique des chercheurs se réclamant de l’école de Los Angeles. Ceux-ci entendent remplacer le paradigme écologique et le modèle de Burgess par une conception postmoderne de la géographie urbaine et proposer le modèle du keno capitalism . Les modèles et les métaphores de la géographie urbaine sont revisités. La discussion concerne plusieurs aspects de la contribution de l’école de Chicago et de son influence en géographie urbaine. Elle porte sur les modèles de croissance urbaine et de localisation, mais aussi sur les approches interactionnistes qui s’intéressent aux acteurs sociaux. Cette discussion nous permet de situer la proposition de l’école de Los Angeles non pas en rupture avec Chicago, mais bien dans sa continuité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".