MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091833665 · doi:10.1242/jeb.064279

SOCIAL SOLDIERS: <i>CLEAN</i> MEAN FIGHTING MACHINES

2012· article· en· W2091833665 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica U. Meir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyVictorySocial animalEcologyGenealogyLawZoologyHistoryPoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soldiers are often deemed crucial in the defense of their social insect colonies from foreign invaders. One such insect – the tiny slim winged thrips, Kladothrips intermedius – lives and feeds on acacias, forming an abnormal growth of plant tissue that they then control. The enlarged forelimbs of this species' soldiers were thought to aid in defending its turf against its foe, the specialized invader Kladothrips dyskritus. However, previous observations of combat between these species yielded conflicting results, casting doubt on the utility of K. intermedius' forelimbs for defence and generating speculation about alternative roles for the soldiers. Captivated by these diminutive crusaders, Christine Turnbull from Macquarie University, Australia, and her Canadian and Australian collaborators set out to resolve these inconsistencies. Having previously identified anti-microbial defence tactics in other insects, they opted to evaluate the interaction between K. intermedius and micro-organisms, in addition to its contests with its traditional nemesis, K. dyskritus.First, Turnbull and her colleagues assessed the role of K. intermedius' fortified forelimbs in defence. The team collected both thrips species from Acacia plants in South Australia, tossing one defender (K. intermedius) and one attacker (K. dyskritus) into tiny tubes to fight to the death, an established technique in studying these warring factions. They then threw sex into the mix, wondering whether male and female soldiers had different odds of victory. The team established the sex of every K. intermedius defender and paired each individual in combat with a K. dyskritus invader, taking detailed images and measurements of the soldiers' body segments, legs and wings post-battle. They discovered that K. intermedius males have shorter forelimbs and are more slender than their female conspecifics, but they did not find a significant difference in combat performance between the sexes. Contrary to the assumption that enhanced forelimbs impart the upper hand in battle, the bulkier builds and heftier limbs of females did not win them any more victories than the more petite males. Forelimb size within a sex also had no bearing on battle outcome, adding to the ambiguity of their value in combat.To test their hypothesis that these warriors may be vital for guarding against micro-organisms, the team collected K. intermedius soldiers, as well as members of the docile working class. Washing groups of individuals from each class to obtain the compounds that they secrete onto their body surfaces, the scientists then tested the effects of the soldier and worker rinses on spores of the specialized fungus Cordyceps bassiana. Recording the fungal growth using optical density measurements, the team found that the rinses from the soldiers were much more effective at suppressing fungal growth than those from the non-warring workers.Rather than serving their colony solely with brute force, these researchers believe that K. intermedius soldiers also expend considerable resources contending with micro-organisms. It is known that social insects host a diversity of microbes, from pesky parasites that reduce insect reproductive capacity to beneficial bacteria that provide essential nutrients to their insect host, suggesting coevolution in these relationships. The work of Turnbull and colleagues suggests that micro-organisms have played as important a role as macroorganisms in the evolution of social insect soldiers. As these scientists might advise, don't count out the little guy!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207