The performance of time-dependent density functional theory based on a noncollinear exchange-correlation potential in the calculations of excitation energies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present work we have studied the accuracy of excitation energies calculated from spin-flip transitions with a formulation of time-dependent density functional theory based on a noncollinear exchange-correlation potential proposed in a previous study. We compared the doublet-doublet excitation energies from spin-flip transitions and ordinary transitions, calculated the multiplets splitting of some atoms, the singlet-triplet gaps of some diradicals, the energies of excited quartet states with a doublet ground state. In addition, we attempted to calculate transition energies with excited states as reference. We compared the triplet excitation energies and singlet-triplet separations of the excited state from spin-flip and ordinary transitions. As an application, we show that using excited quartet state as reference can help us fully resolve excited states spin multiplets. In total the obtained excitation energies calculated from spin-flip transitions agree quite well with other theoretical results or experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it