GluR2‐free α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionate receptors intensify demyelination in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We adopted a genetic approach to test the importance of edited GluR2-free, Ca(2+)-permeable, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptors in the pathophysiology of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an inflammatory demyelinative disorder resembling multiple sclerosis. Initial studies showed that oligodendroglial lineage cells from mice lacking functional copies of the gene encoding the GluR3 AMPA receptor subunit (Gria3) had a diminished capacity to assemble edited GluR2-free AMPA receptors, and were resistant to excitotoxicity in vitro. Neurological deficits and spinal cord demyelination elicited by immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide were substantially milder in these Gria3 mutant mice than in their wild-type littermates. These results support the hypothesis that oligodendroglial excitotoxicity mediated by AMPA receptors that do not contain edited GluR2 subunits contributes to demyelination in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and suggest that inhibiting these Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors would be therapeutic in multiple sclerosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".