MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091911080 · doi:10.1021/ef900557p

Speciation of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Station Flue Gas<sup>†</sup>

2009· article· en· W2091911080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pushan Shah, Vladimir Strezov, Peter F. Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHarvard Graduate School of Education
KeywordsMercury (programming language)CoalEnvironmental chemistryFlue gasMethylmercuryChemistryEnvironmental scienceCoal combustion productsBiotaTrace elementMERCUREBioaccumulationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mercury is a potentially toxic trace metal. Mercury exists naturally in coal in very low concentrations, having been incorporated during the coalification process. Consequently, coal-fired power stations are a major anthropogenic source of mercury because of the large quantity of coal used for electricity generation. In the environment, mercury transforms into methylmercury, a potential neurotoxin, bioaccumulates in aquatic biota, and subsequently, enters the food chain. The subsequent environmental fate and ability to capture mercury prior to emission are dependent upon its different physicochemical forms and oxidation states, known as speciation. In this work, speciation of mercury was conducted at five different coal power stations across Australia (one in New South Wales, three in Western Australia, and one in Queensland) by the Ontario Hydro sampling and analysis method. The total Hg concentrations in the emissions of these plants were found to be in the range of 1.9−5.6 μg Nm −3 . Particle-bound mercury Hg P occurred in very low proportions of 0.3−3.7%, while variable proportions of Hg 0 and Hg II were observed. Kinetic calculations were performed assuming a homogeneous system to understand role of the chlorine/mercury ratio of feed coal in the oxidation of mercury during power station combustion. Results from this study are compared to previous work published in the literature and discussed with respect to operating parameters of the power station.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207