MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091929184 · doi:10.1177/1470412909354263

Outlining Art: On Jean-Luc Nancy’s Trop and Le plaisir au dessin

2010· article· en· W2091929184 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visual Culture · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt historyExhibitionThe artsPoliticsSubject (documents)Contemporary artObject (grammar)Art worldPerformance artPhilosophyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘Art is always the art of making a world’, affirms Jean-Luc Nancy. Taking into account the philosopher’s recent involvement in two ‘exhibitions’ in which he played an active role, both ‘subject’ and object’ in Trop. Jean-Luc Nancy (Montréal, 2005) and co-commissioner to Le plaisir au dessin (Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon, 2007), this article probes into this nuclear formula — art, making, world — at the heart of Nancy’s aesthetic, philosophical and political stand: first, by examining how his thought is grounded in the ‘ cum’, the ‘ avec’, which takes place between art and the world, art as world; second, by assessing how this ‘making’ occurs from within the form of art, through the ‘ forma formans’ or through a methexis remodelling mimêsis at its core; and last, but certainly not least, by showing how this aisthesis is also and foremost political in its very making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it