MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091954202 · doi:10.1142/s0218301310015400

MEASUREMENT OF TWO-PROTON CORRELATION FROM THE BREAK-UP OF <sup>23</sup><font>Al</font>

2010· article· en· W2091954202 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pei Zhou, D. Q. Fang, Y. G., X. Z. Cai, J. G. CHEN, Wei Guo, X. Sun, Wenlong Tian, HW Wang, GQ Zhang, X. G. Cao, Yunlong Fu, Ziyao Hu, J. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Togano, N. Aoi, H. Baba, T. Honda, K. Okada, Y. Hara, K. Ieki, Yuji Ishibashi, Y. Itou, N. Iwasa, S. Kanno, T. Kawabata, H. Kimura, Y. Kondo, K. Kurita, M. Kurokawa, T. Moriguchi, Hiroshi Murakami, H. Oishi, S. Ota, A. Ozawa, H. Sakuraï, S. Shimoura, R. Shioda, E. Takeshita, Satoshi Takeuchi, Kazunari Yamada, Y. Yamada, Y. Yasuda, K. Yoneda, T. Motobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics E · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRIKENMcMaster University
KeywordsExcited stateCyclotronProtonPhysicsProjectileAtomic physicsNuclear physicsProton emissionElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments of 23 Al and 22 Mg radioactive beams bombarding a 12 C target at an energy of 60 ~70 A MeV have been performed at the projectile fragment separator beamline (RIPS) in the RIKEN Ring Cyclotron Facility to study the two-proton emission from 23 Al and 22 Mg excited states, respectively. The trajectorie of the decay products, namely 21 Na + p + p from 23 Al and 20 Ne + p + p from 22 Mg , are clean identified. The relative momentum and opening angle between two protons in the rest frame of three body decay channels are obtained by relativistic-kinematics reconstruction. The results demonstrate that there are some di-proton emission components from 2 He cluster for the excited 23 Al and 22 Mg .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ESame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207