NATURAL CONVECTION HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER FROM A VERTICAL FLAT PLATE WITH VARIABLE WALL TEMPERATURE AND CONCENTRATION TO POWER-LAW FLUIDS WITH YIELD STRESS IN A POROUS MEDIUM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of natural convection coupled heat and mass transfer of non-Newtonian power law fluids with yield stress from a vertical flat plate in a fluid-saturated porous medium is analyzed under boundary layer approximations. Similarity solutions are obtained for the general case of power law variations of the wall temperature and concentration. Velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles as well as local heat and mass transfer rates are presented and discussed for different values of the rheological parameters of a power-law fluid, the Lewis number, and the thermal and concentration buoyancy ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it