MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092009720 · doi:10.1353/hjr.2011.0028

Henry James’s Virtual Beast

2011· article· en· W2092009720 on OpenAlexaff
Omri Moses

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œHenry James review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJungleFantasyAnticipation (artificial intelligence)Virtuality (gaming)AestheticsPsychoanalysisHistoryArtLiteraturePsychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article draws some connections between Leo Bersani’s early work and his late book, Intimacies , tracking how he accounts for individuals who succeed in embracing a future more open to possibility. He extols literary characters such as the protagonist of Henry James’s “The Beast in the Jungle,” who lives his life in a fantasy of anticipation. The piece criticizes Bersani for extolling a “pure,” unrealized form of desire over one that is more pragmatically oriented. James, it suggests, explores a form of “virtuality” or potential within situations that requires individuals to make distinct choices, rather than perpetually to suspend choice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œHenry James reviewSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207