MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092010903 · doi:10.1029/2010eo380001

An Underwater Laboratory at the Fraser River Delta

2010· article· en· W2092010903 on OpenAlexafffund
Gwyn Lintern, Philip R. Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsBiological dispersalRiver deltaSubmarine pipelineEnvironmental scienceSedimentOceanographyDeltaWetlandSampling (signal processing)UnderwaterEcosystemHydrology (agriculture)GeologyEcologyGeomorphologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deltas, home to more than 500 million people and the site of vital wetland ecosystems across the world, are of tremendous economic importance to many countries. The physical dynamics at river mouths determines how sediment particles and contaminants are dispersed offshore by mechanisms that include waves, currents, and gravity flows, but how and when particular mechanisms operate are often inferred rather than known. Thus, scientists' understanding of sediment and contaminant dispersal mechanisms is only rudimentary. The problems lie in the intermittent operation of the different mechanisms, which occur on tidal, seasonal, and interannual time scales, and the difficulty of making long time series measurements at high sampling rates in these challenging oceanographic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207