MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092021470 · doi:10.1353/nin.2006.0058

Playing for Their Nation: Baseball and the American Military during World War II (review)

2006· article· en· W2092021470 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bill Swanson

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorld War IISpanish Civil WarMilitary sociologyVietnam WarOperational level of warTastePopulationMilitary operations other than warLawHistoryPolitical scienceMedia studiesEconomic historySociologyPsychologyRed Army's tactics in World War IIDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Playing for Their Nation: Baseball and the American Military during World War II Bill Swanson (bio) Steven R. Bullock. Playing for Their Nation: Baseball and the American Military during World War II. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004. 183 pp. Cloth, $30.00. Numerous books and articles have been written about the state of professional baseball during America's involvement in World War II. The quality [End Page 148] of play during this time was significantly affected by the draining of the talent pool, with many professional baseball players drafted to support the war effort. Most of these books examine how the war affected the professional game in America. Bullock's book, however, provides a unique perspective: a portrayal of baseball within the military establishment during World War II and the inseparable link between baseball and the war effort. Bullock states that "from the turn of the twentieth century to the beginning of World War II, the American people enjoyed an unusual and unprecedented fascination with the game of baseball . . . it personified the nation's values and helped to unify an increasingly diverse population." It was only natural, with the outbreak of hostilities and the United States' forced entry into World War II, that baseball would be an important figure on the American military landscape. Baseball in the military during the war was a morale booster for the American servicemen. It provided a taste of the familiar to countless GIs separated from the comforts of home for the first time in their lives. Military commanders believed that participation in baseball games helped prepare their men both physically and mentally for combat, and served to keep idle servicemen out of trouble. Baseball was also a common denominator for men who were suddenly thrust together from every region of the United States. Through participation and conversation, baseball became a unifying force. In addition to widespread participation by the common gi, exhibitions by professional players became a mainstay of military life. Over ninety percent of the players on Major League rosters at the start of the war eventually played for "Uncle Sam's team." The majority of these professional-baseball-player soldiers continued to play ball while on the government payroll, forming some impressive teams. Naturally, this was a source of pride and bragging rights for military commanders. Bullock recognizes professional baseball for its support of the war effort, which served to appease those who questioned the decision to continue playing baseball during the war. Money was raised for the war effort from the proceeds of the annual All-Star games, the World Series, and designated "relief games." Baseball equipment was donated to the military, and Major League players were enlisted to help promote the sale of war bonds. Bullock also discusses the effect of the war on many professional players. For some, it created speculation on "what might have been" with regard to career totals. For others, the time away from the diamond in a professional capacity proved too costly, as their wartime commitment eliminated their window of opportunity, effectively putting an end to their professional baseball career. Bullock's work is a welcome addition to the baseball fan's library because [End Page 149] of its unique perspective. He makes a strong case for baseball's contribution to America's ultimate success in World War II. He provides an exhaustive account of the many outstanding baseball teams "created" (sometimes by borderline unethical means), which played exhibitions to entertain the troops. Bullock perhaps becomes tedious with details on this topic, but nonetheless he creates a vivid picture of how baseball bolstered military life at all levels of play. Therefore, for the baseball historian, Bullock has provided a piece of the puzzle that has been previously missing. His work is an excellent companion to the numerous books about professional baseball during World War II. Bill Swanson Bill Swanson is the chair of the Department of Physical Education/Recreation at Houghton College in Houghton, New York. For the past eleven summers, he has been the batting practice pitcher for the Buffalo Bisons (triple A affiliate of the Cleveland Indians). Copyright © 2006 the University of Nebraska Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207