MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092027610 · doi:10.1115/gt2012-70036

Development and Evaluation of a High Frequency Response Signal Conditioning Amplifier for Miniature, Silicon Bridge-Type Pressure Transducers

2012· article· en· W2092027610 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan W. Ilott, W. Allan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency responseTransducerSignal conditioningAmplifierLinear phaseSIGNAL (programming language)Bandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringLow-pass filterAcousticsBand-pass filterPhase responsePressure sensorFilter (signal processing)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to their small size, miniature silicon pressure transducers offer wide-band frequency response. Taking advantage of the high-frequency response of these pressure transducers within an electrically noisy environment requires high bandwidth amplification and anti-alias filtering. This paper describes a signal conditioning amplifier that provides for linear phase filtering of a differential or single-ended input signal and outputs a differential signal. Differential signals are suitable for driving long cable runs that may be required when digital recording hardware cannot be located in close proximity to experimental apparatus. The design has also been shown to exhibit nearly constant group delay over the pass-band, reducing the need for substantial oversampling of the pressure transducer signals to avoid the nonlinear phase response typical of low-pass filters in the vicinity of their cut-off frequency. Testing has shown the module to provide a very flat pass-band response while achieving a high-order filter response at the cut-off frequency, along with excellent steady state DC accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207