MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092044923 · doi:10.3166/geo.21.8-42

Approche géosémantique intégrée pour les cubes évolutifs de données géospatiales

2011· article· fr· W2092044923 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Bakillah

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale de géomatique · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsINTHumanitiesArtPhilosophyComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RtSUMt. Das un contexte decisionnel, les bases de donnees geospatiales multidimensionnelles representent souvem des donnees provenant de sources heterogenes et evolutives. L'evolution de la Slnicture multidimensionnelle el de l'evolution du decoupage spatial empechent le lraitement des requetes spaliotemporefles. en raison de l'absence de liens entre les cubes crees li differentes epoques. Dans cel or/icle, nous propOSQ/IS une nouvelle approche geosemantique au probleme de l'evolution de la SlruClUre multidimensionnelle el de l'evolutiol/ des membres de la dimel/sion spaliale. Celte approche geosemalllique integre 1/11 nouveau modele de mappil/g semantique adapte a la structure hierarchique des cubes, puis l'outil Oracle spalial pour l'etablissement des liens geometriques entre les membres de la dimension spatiale des diflerents cubes. Une methode de transformalion matricielle est imegree afin de traiter les requetes spaliotemporelles entre les cubes. L 'implementation et l'experimemation de l'approche dans le domaine de la foresterie demontre qu'elle permet a l'utilisateur d'obtenir des approximations valables pour des requetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale de géomatiqueSame topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207