MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092052238 · doi:10.1116/1.1529652

Controlled growth of periodic pillars by glancing angle deposition

2002· article· en· W2092052238 on OpenAlex
Brian Dick, Michael J. Brett, T. Smy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAperiodic graphMicrostructureMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)Angle of incidence (optics)Photonic crystalLayer (electronics)OpticsComposite materialOptoelectronicsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that glancing angle deposition (GLAD) coupled with a prefabricated seed layer can be used to fabricate periodic microstructures. In this article, we show that the column competition effects inherent within aperiodic GLAD films can be delayed in periodic films due to the tendency of the film to achieve a preferred density at a given flux incidence angle. This technique, coupled with the use of the three-dimensional ballistic simulator, may allow for the design and use of periodic GLAD microstructures in such applications as magnetic pillars and three-dimensional photonic crystals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it