MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092053879 · doi:10.1115/imece2013-65785

Nonlinear Planar Dynamics of Fluid-Conveying Cantilevered Extensible Pipes

2013· article· en· W2092053879 on OpenAlexaff
Mergen H. Ghayesh, Michael P. Paı̈doussis, Marco Amabili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBifurcationFlutterNonlinear systemEquations of motionBifurcation diagramDisplacement (psychology)MechanicsFlow (mathematics)Transverse planeClassical mechanicsPhysicsMathematicsAerodynamicsStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper for the first time investigates the nonlinear planar dynamics of a cantilevered extensible pipe conveying fluid; the centreline of the pipe is considered to be extensible resulting in coupled longitudinal and transverse equations of motion; specifically, the kinetic and potential energies are obtained in terms of longitudinal and transverse displacements and then the extended version of the Lagrange equations for systems containing non-material volumes is employed to derive the equations of motion. Direct time integration along with the pseudo-arclength continuation method are employed to solve the discretized equations of motion. Bifurcation diagrams of the system are constructed as the flow velocity is increased as the bifurcation parameter. As opposed to the case of an inextensible pipe, an extensible pipe elongates in the axial direction as the flow velocity is increased from zero. At the critical flow velocity, the stability of the system is lost via a supercritical Hopf bifurcation, emerging from the trivial solution for the transverse displacement and non-trivial solution for the longitudinal displacement and leading to a flutter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207