MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092065396 · doi:10.3138/ecf.26.1.67

“Glorious Perverseness”: Stoic Pride and Domestic Heroism in Richardson’s Novels

2013· article· en· W2092065396 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anna Deters

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrideWickednessStoicismVirtueEmbodied cognitionCharacter (mathematics)PhilosophyLiteratureSociologyAestheticsEpistemologyArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to his creation of Sir Charles Grandison as a new male exemplar, literary critics credit Samuel Richardson with domesticating the prideful heroism embodied by his character Lovelace. This article revises this account of Richardson’s reformulation of heroism by considering his reliance on stoicism as key to his engagement with the ethics of heroic exemplarity. How to promote a self-conscious practice of individual virtue and at the same time warn against the wickedness of stoic pride and self-love is a central moral problem in Richardson’s novels. Through probing the ethical complexities that inhere in his protagonists’ self-awareness of their virtue, Richardson comes to accept this pride as an integral component of domestic heroism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicReligion, Gender, and EnlightenmentFrench-language works237,207