MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092104490 · doi:10.1159/000167979

What Is the Underlying Defect in Patients with Isolated, Proximal Renal Tubular Acidosis?

2008· article· en· W2092104490 on OpenAlex
Mitchell L. Halperin, Kamel S. Kamel, Jean Éthier, Peter Magner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Nephrology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal function and acid-base balance
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal tubular acidosisAcidosisRenal functionInternal medicineReabsorptionMetabolic acidosisEndocrinologyBicarbonateRenal physiologyExcretionUrologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our aim in this article is to propose a new hypothesis concerning the etiology of renal tubular acidosis (RTA) in that subgroup of patients who have the isolated, primary type of proximal RTA. We suggest that their underlying disorder is a more alkaline intracellular pH of the proximal convoluted tubule. Increased alkalinity of proximal tubular cells would explain the low rate of bicarbonate reabsorption per liter glomerular filtration and the decreased rate of ammonium excretion despite a low urine pH and the presence of chronic metabolic acidosis. Additional diagnostic tests to evaluate this hypothesis in this specific subgroup of patients with proximal RTA are also outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it