MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092125070 · doi:10.1021/ja0388562

Glycosidic Bond Cleavage of Thymidine by Low-Energy Electrons

2004· article· en· W2092125070 on OpenAlexafffund
Yi Zheng, Pierre Cloutier, Darel J. Hunting, J. Richard Wagner, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health Research
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryThymineThymidineGlycosidic bondBond cleavageCleavage (geology)DNAElectronIonizationPhotochemistryYield (engineering)Electron ionizationIrradiationOrganic chemistryBiochemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thymidine was exposed to low-energy electrons (LEE) as a thin solid film under a high vacuum. Nonvolatile radiation products, remaining on the irradiated surface, were analyzed by HPLC/UV and GC/MS. Here, we show that exposure of thymidine to 3-100 eV electrons gives thymine as a major product with a yield of 3.2 x 10-2 per electron (about one-third of the total decomposition of thymidine). The formation of thymine indicates that LEE induces cleavage of the glycosidic bond separating the base and sugar moieties, suggesting a nonionizing resonant process involving dissociative attachment (<15 eV). In contrast, this reaction is not very efficient by DNA base ionization and does not occur by the reaction of solvated electrons with DNA. These studies introduce a new mechanism of DNA damage involving the interaction of LEE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207